Love, notice, and the inhibition of viewpoint out of close solutions

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will Human Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place away from accessory inside the human mating. Report about Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Internet sites contradiction reviewed. Journal from Personal Things, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A personal technology you to definitely minimizes public involvement and you can emotional really-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Meters. (2001). Number, time, and lifetime of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Latest People Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data out of closeness, appeal, and you may relationship: Evaluation the fresh assumptions of your own triangular principle away from love. Emotional Reports, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Effect most readily useful regarding carrying out bad: Personal comparisons contained in this personal relationships. Log out-of Personality and you can Societal Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit cognition out-of close competition. Record out of Identification and Public Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

Good. (2001)mitment and you may dating restoration mechanisms

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention in order to glamorous selection: The fresh new changed therapy regarding matchmaking restoration. Advancement and you will Peoples Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential investigation from argument and you may accord within the troubled and you will nondistressed marital couples. Diary out of Consulting and Systematic Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, Good. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation on the web: What’s the huge interest? Journal out-of Societal Facts, 58(1), https://gorgeousbrides.net/da/ukrainske-brude/ 9–29.

The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization therefore the framework out-of fulfillment for the personal relationships

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-research purposes when you look at the intimate relationships: A style of global enhancement and you will specific verification. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A beneficial. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents throughout the study of couples correspondence (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Drive.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-counselor thread through the contact regarding attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Principle, Browse, Behavior, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest public monitoring program: Enhanced sensitivity in order to personal cues since an adaptive a reaction to personal difference. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest public outcast: Ostracism, personal exemption, getting rejected, and you will bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Drive.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Globally and you will particular relational models regarding the experience of societal affairs. Diary regarding Identification and Personal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can suggestions trying to for the personal relationships. Character and you will Public Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can specific accessory representations in adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Diary Away from Personal And personal Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. When you look at the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate dating: Restoration and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection myself impact certainly one of partners just like the a purpose of the latest resemblance within mutual event. Identity And Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience regarding extrinsic rewards toward liking and you may enjoying. Journal off Character and you will Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.