Marriage agreements perform have a tendency to suggest the timeframe from inside the and therefore amarriage need to have chosen to take lay

step one. Yet, for the family history, most of us knowthat for each and every code there’s an exclusion. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact not one person most understands just how to utilize brand new conditions orrules which have one decisive adjective including always, maybe, most likely,most likely, etc. It would be fascinating in the event that truth be told there almost every other advice ofjointures are made a year or several immediately after a well-known relationship date.

2. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards relationships of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, immediately after taken off brand new fifth LordClifford? Who does restrict its wedding big date.

Arthur

Presumably, if the an effective dispensation was tried and you will offered, it would havebeen because of the among the many following, that can can be found in the correspondingregister guide, whether it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop regarding Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520

5. In case the tenth Lord Clifford really does marry at the beginning of 1487 [state January] andhas Age afterwards in this 12 months, does new chronology maybe not performs?

John arms?

E created in late 1487, Henry created for the 1488/nine, Joan during the ,etc. completing the brand new names of send regarding . If the (a) thechronology however performs; and you may (b) their wedding portion was not lower; thenwe simply have new 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that’s during the oppositionto the fresh new conjecture you to definitely she is a valid child.

six. About your 1505 pedigree: Is the Clifford daughters the latest onlyknown Henry VII connections excluded? Were there anyone else? Therefore,won’t that mirror poorly on this subject file once the a source?

From evaluations I’ve produced from new c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith this new 1480-1500 Visitation of your own Northern pedigrees, which can be

About c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, brand new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin good Clifford pedigree, but rather in the St. John pedigree. Just like the I’mnot accustomed the newest St. John family relations, adopting the ‘s the information asit looks regarding c.1505 pedigree, as the taken from the newest 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. post. The fresh new phrasing during the quotations is exactly because looks inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Out-of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess from Somerset got about three husbands.” Of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My personal Lady the latest King’s Mommy.” who’d “The newest Queen.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic spouse.” she got 3 daus & 2 sons:

An effective. “Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Rod of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded towards the Woman Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke off Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[another type of youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had five pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Four daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun out-of Shaftesbury https://internationalwomen.net/sv/blog/kinesiska-datingsajter/.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you may sistren.” With issueindicated, yet not named.C2. “Elizabeth, wedded so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “E, married first on the Lord Zouche; once for the LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” That they had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated yet not named.

Margaret Duchess of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. regarding K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Elizabeth.”